• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Romeo Squared

Defense with a Baltic edge

  • Air Force
  • Army
  • Navy
  • Russia
  • Military strategy
  • About
    • Privacy Policy

We need better IR theories to explain Russia

2018-10-20 By Anders Puck Nielsen Leave a Comment

Andrej Krickovic in a policy memo for [PONARS Eurasia] [1]:

Russia’s challenge has found its way to the top of Washington’s agenda. Yet, mainstream International Relations (IR) scholarship offers little guidance to leaders in the way of understanding Russia’s behavior or formulating policies to address it. As such, Russia not only represents a challenge to U.S. leadership and the liberal international order, but also to established IR theories, which have failed to recognize how Russia’s anxieties about declining status have pushed it toward a confrontational revisionist foreign policy. Though deeply committed to preserving Great Power status, Russia‘s revisionist aims are constrained as its leaders are well aware of the limits of their country’s power. For policymakers, the fundamental challenge lies not in containing Russia, but in encouraging it to bolster its status in peaceful and constructive ways.

I am not sure that the explanation of declining status is comprehensive enough to explain what is going on in the case of Russia. But Krickovic is spot on in his criticism of the traditional IR theories.

This touches on a bigger question which I think that IR theorists must address: There is something wrong with the standards for theories in IR scholarship. The quality is just not high enough to meet normal requirements within scholarly work in other branches of research. Despite their inability to adequately explain or predict development and their unsuitability to guide policy making, liberal and realist theories stick around with seeming perpetuity.

With regards to Russia, I would recommend Gerard Toal’s take. He also touches on the loss of great power status as an explanation but just as one element alongside several others.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Related

Filed Under: Military strategy and politics Tagged With: NATO, Russia, USA

Anders Puck Nielsen is the writer of the Romeo Squared blog. He is a military analyst at the Center for Maritime Operations at the Royal Danish Defense College.

Reader Interactions

< Previous
Next >

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Top Posts

  • Turkey is losing Leopard 2 tanks in Syria at an alarming pace
  • Helicopter scandals for everyone, Black Hawk to the rescue
  • Political officers return in Russia’s military
  • A look at the Baltic Fleet and the defense of Kaliningrad
  • Russia's new Karakurt-class corvette is an aggressive little warship

Follow blog via e-mail

Featured

Russia’s military budget has nothing to do with the GDP of Spain

An often used reference to the GDP of Spain says nothing about Russia’s military potential. Instead, Russia’s defense budget gives them the same purchasing power as Germany, France, and the United Kingdom combined.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Romeo Squared

  • Air Force
  • Army
  • Navy
  • Russia
  • Military strategy
  • About
    ▲
    • Privacy Policy