• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Romeo Squared

Defense with a Baltic edge

  • Air Force
  • Army
  • Navy
  • Russia
  • Military strategy
  • About
    • Privacy Policy

U.S. Navy plans to develop two new classes of submarine

2018-10-28 By Anders Puck Nielsen Leave a Comment

David Axe for War is Boring:

The U.S. Navy plans to develop two new classes of submarine, according to congressional analysis of the sea service’s shipbuilding plan for 2019.

The submarines could help to maintain the Navy’s advantage in submarine-on-submarine warfare while also filling a looming shortfall in the sailing branch’s capacity for sea-to-land missile strikes.

But not without cost. Designing and building five of the new Large Payload Submarine cruise-missile subs and 30 of the new SSN(X) attack submarines could set back U.S. taxpayers $200 billion by 2048.

They want to replace the Los Angeles Class attack submarines and those Ohio-class submarines that are refitted with Tomahawk cruise missiles. Until recently the plan was to make a modified Virginia-class for these jobs, but now the U.S. Navy has upgraded its ambitions.

I wonder how this proposal will fare given the recent announcement that president Trump has ordered a $33 billion cut in defense spending next year. It is a lot more expensive to build the new classes than to build modified Virginia subs:

The Navy’s old plan to upgrade the Virginia design in the 2030s would have cost $3.6 billion per ship, the [Congressional Budget Office] estimated. Designing and building SSN(X)s instead could cost $5.5 billion per sub, according to the CBO. The budget office predicted each Large Payload Submarine would come with a whopping $7.7-billion price tag.

So with defense cuts coming up, I want to see the new submarines before I believe it. Could well be that the Navy has to settle for the original more modest plan. Also, I cannot help but think that it would be better to go for the cheaper submarine and buy more of them.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Related

Filed Under: Navy Tagged With: USA

Anders Puck Nielsen is the writer of the Romeo Squared blog. He is a military analyst at the Center for Maritime Operations at the Royal Danish Defense College.

Reader Interactions

< Previous
Next >

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Top Posts

  • Helicopter scandals for everyone, Black Hawk to the rescue
  • Turkey is losing Leopard 2 tanks in Syria at an alarming pace
  • Why Small Navies Prefer Warfighting over Counter-Piracy
  • Russia has found money to repair the flagship of the Baltic Fleet
  • A look at the Baltic Fleet and the defense of Kaliningrad

Follow blog via e-mail

Featured

Russia’s military budget has nothing to do with the GDP of Spain

An often used reference to the GDP of Spain says nothing about Russia’s military potential. Instead, Russia’s defense budget gives them the same purchasing power as Germany, France, and the United Kingdom combined.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Romeo Squared

  • Air Force
  • Army
  • Navy
  • Russia
  • Military strategy
  • About
    ▲
    • Privacy Policy